If you
have been following the news in recent months, you may have heard the term,
"Net Neutrality" and you may have wondered what this term meant. The official definition is "the
principle that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data
on the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differently by user,
content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of
communication.”1 That definition
might not be the clearest for everyone, so at its most basic, it is simply that
the people who provide your internet cannot censor, filter, artificially slow,
or charge extra for anything on the internet based on based on the site, the user, or any other reason. “Well, why is this important,” you might ask. Net neutrality is one of the most important
functions of the Internet as it allows for free and open communication without
the meddling of a third party. It also
allows for technological advancement and healthy competition between
businesses. ISPs are not able to filter
content they don’t agree with or artificially slow content they may not want to provide. All content must be
provided equally.
“That
sounds great,” you might say, “why would that be in danger?” Well my friend, because the major cable
providers want to make more money. AT&T,
Verizon, Time Warner Cable, and Comcast are four major telecom companies lobbying the
government to do away with the principle of Net Neutrality. These companies have actually spent hundreds
of millions of dollars over the last several years on lobbying against Net Neutrality,
with AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast spending a combined $66 million in 2012.2
Verizon actually sued the FCC in order to challenge the government organization’s
ability to enforce Net Neutrality rules and unfortunately for Net Neutrality,
Verizon won. All of these lawsuits and
lobbying are leading to exactly what the cable companies want, the creation of
internet “fast lanes.” These so called “fast
lanes” would allegedly allow for users or sites to pay ISPs extra for faster
service while those that did not pay would be forced to use a much slower
connection.
I’m sure
you can see the inherent problems with this idea. First, customers would have to pay a premium
to their ISPs, on top of their already high prices, for “faster” internet. An even uglier prospect is the idea of paying
a la carte for sites or having sites “packaged” like cable channels as shown by these hypothetical images.
As you
can see the death of Net Neutrality would be terrible for consumers and the
economy. “But what can I do? How can I fight against these billion dollar telecom corporations?” The first thing
you can do is visit https://www.battleforthenet.com/. There they will help you connect with your state’s
elected representatives and you can let them know you support Net
Neutrality. You can find more information about what is happening at the FCC here: http://www.savetheinternet.com/net-neutrality-what-you-need-know-now.
Let’s keep the Internet free and open for everyone!
Let’s keep the Internet free and open for everyone!
Logging
off…
Matt
1Tim Wu
(2003). "Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination". Journal on
telecom and high tech law. Retrieved 15 Sept 2014.
2Drutman, Lee, and Zander Furnas. "These Companies Spend the
Most Money to Kill Net Neutrality." The Daily Dot.
N.p., 5 Sept. 2014. Web. 15 Sept. 2014.
Images taken from Google Images
Images taken from Google Images
No comments:
Post a Comment